Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether employees should regular switch their jobs or not has arose a strong controversy among concerning people. While I accept that changing jobs is beneficial in some extents , it is my opinion that having a long commitment within a field is more advantageous.
On the one hand, there is a variety of reasons why staffs have a tendency of choosing to seek for new jobs. Firstly, it gives workers an easier access to master a wide range of vital soft skills. In deeds, the more job seekers start new jobs, the more different skills their learn from various working environments. For instance, some financial analysits who are extremely professional at analysing financial statements and economic trends, may find it interesting to learn presentation skill when they move to be spellbinders. Secondly, a number of seniors find suitable paths after failing at serveral first jobs. Let’s take a Vietnamese businessman – Quoc Anh as a telling example, not until the age of over 40, after leaving some positions as manufactoring managers in many factories, did he become succesfull with starting-up a retail outlets chain.
On the other hand, I believe that staying long in the same sector is beneficial in some ways. Initially, staffs are bestowed upon the chances to get fast-tracked promotion in their career laders. It is undeniable that with longer periods of dedication for the thriving of the organizations, employees are more highly appriciated. Besides, they also earn bigger remuneration package to meet their needs such as luxurious cars or houses. Further more, commiting with a job is conducive to strengthening the brandnames of employees. Irfferutably, on the ground of deeply understading about the companies they work for, staffs thoroughly aware of strengths and defficiencies of the businessese so that they could contribute valuable and crucious ideas to cultivate the companies' competitive advances. As a result, they mark themselve on other’s respect, leading to increase their job satisfaction.
By the way of conclusion, although switching jobs time by time can be advantageous in their own ways, it seems to me that developing career path in the same sector bring more bright sights.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their every day life. What are their problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s undeniable that with longer periods of dedication for the thriving of the organ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26878612717 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05203543744 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.163460155 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.235294118 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114729111909 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340731205974 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277916778247 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696489286965 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190158538206 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.