Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others argue that happiness depends on different factors.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Personal joy and pleasure are inextricably linked with financial success according to some people, whereas others argue that this depends upon other extrinsic factors to economic wealth. I contend that both arguments are justified in diverse dimensions in accordance with each individual’s definition of happiness.
For one thing, a reasonable justification for those who advocate that the mental well-being of a person is associated with economic prosperity is the demand for a sense of secured material satisfaction about life. Individuals whose ability to afford possessions and relish an ideal living standard are often the desirable models for the others. This group is able to pursue their dreams without concerns of an ordinary person to survive such as seeking for vacancies in today’s fierce job market or being headed for financial crisis from various aspects of the living costs. Instead, they derive a sense of financial security from the economic success they attained. Yet, the target for such pleasure is an unanimous target of the general civilians when none of them want to endure poor living quality, leading to a number of proponents for this view.
For another, the opponents’ view could be explained by some reasons, chief of which is that the definition of a happy life varies in people's attitudes and perspective when economic achievements are not the final goal to them solely. Personnel in different domains such as researchers, teachers belong to the knowledgeable part of the society. Happiness to them constitutes the maximum potential in working abilities to observe the results or enlighten and gear the others toward meaningful life. For instance, a tutor will feel proud of the good grades of the students, reflecting the results of his effective guidance and instruction, which in turn will kindle his passion in the job. The meaningful outlets they pursue are merely the goal for their endeavors, considering the joy of people is also the pleasure of themselves.
To conclude, both views hold certain validity and I partially agree with all of which for the aforementioned reasons. It is important to note that happiness strongly depends on personal attitudes and their perspectives about life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-30 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
2022-01-26 | sonnn | 84 | view |
2022-01-16 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
2021-10-28 | Lâm Yên Chi | 67 | view |
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 89
- In many countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country Others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Parents should take courses in parenting in order to improve the lives of their children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows how leather goods are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d. Yet, the target for such pleasure is an unanimous target of the general civilia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3323943662 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88595089304 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6582245536 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.214285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181450440652 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641488018393 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648609589599 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127377788853 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535005650648 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.