Some people think that robots are very important for humans future development Other however think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion

In recent years, robot technology has been receiving a great deal of public attention. While some people are of opinion that it comes with tremendous positive impacts, others argue that it is harmful to human beings. I will discuss both sides of the argument and explain my support for the latter view.

On the one hand, due to the major progress made in programming as well as the technological advances in engineering, robotic systems can increasingly take over the repetitive work and dangerous jobs for humans. To illustrate that, robots are now participating in packing parcels and cleaning radioactive waste. Moreover, robots are not only cheap alternative labor but also more productive with no breaks, which makes them suitable for boring jobs in the industrial factory. As a result, it creates more free time for people to spend doing what they want, which improves their life quality.

On the other hand, becoming dependent on robots has some negative impacts on people. By letting robots doing all the household chores, people might lose essential skills such as cooking, gardening. As a consequence, people become lazy and it affects their health substantially. In addition, due to the adoption of various types of robots, there are thousands of workers are being laid off, which raises the unemployment rate dramatically. This leads to bigger problems such as poverty, crime, etc...which becomes heavy pressure for society.

In conclusion, although robots can make people's life easier in different ways, this convenience comes with bad consequences. Personally, I think people should limit the use of robots and maintain their essential skill sets.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
In recent years robot technology has been receiving a g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which becomes heavy pressure for society In conclusion although robots can make p...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16226415094 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66024086362 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667924528302 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 265.0 20.2975951904 1306% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1368.0 106.682146367 1282% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 265.0 20.7667163134 1276% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 130.0 7.06120827912 1841% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283998153499 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283998153499 0.084324248473 337% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163673986486 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268011580258 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 135.4 13.0946893788 1034% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -197.5 50.2224549098 -393% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 106.6 11.3001002004 943% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.13 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.55 8.58950901804 251% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.0 10.1190380762 1067% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 10.7795591182 529% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.