Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability, but others believe pupils with different abilities should educated together.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is certainly said that the group of students should be formed by schools on the basis of academic ability, while others say that students with distinctive abilities should be taught together. Although forming a group of students according to academic skill so that they can enhance better performance level, I believe that students with different capabilities must get education together because one student will get support from other to improve their learning skill.
On the one hand, students can grow their performance level if students divided in terms of academic capability because they have to compete with the same academic level pupils. There is a belief that separating learners on the basis of academic skills will increase the speed of learning. For example, the majority of schools in Scotland grouping students according to the education skill because the better teacher can be used for lower students to improve the learning process. However, I believe that this will make sense of discrimination among them because weaker learner feels that they are dumb and not smart and not think good.
On the other hand, learners should get an education in a mixed class of ability because it will allow giving support to each other to tackle their problems. For instance, two students get the same score in reading tests, but both have used different skills. One was good in comprehension and another was efficient in vocabulary. If they both studied together then they can share their learning process and will able to gain a strong grip on both skills. Therefore, I think pupils with different skills should learn together because it will help the student to learn one skill from another.
In conclusion, although class with one ability students will able to speed up of learning process, however, I believe that a mixed class of ability will allow students to improve their weaknesses by getting support from others.
- The natural resources such as oil forests and freshwater are being consuming at an alarming rate What problem does it cause How can we solve these problems 73
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind the bars To what extent do you agree 56
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind the bars To what extent do you agree 56
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind the bars To what extent do you agree 73
- Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability but others believe pupils with different abilities should educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11356466877 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52694187147 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460567823344 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0128772804 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26310112047 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104200191017 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714520834903 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178565196035 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679327934991 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.