Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability but others believe pupils with different abilities should educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability, but others believe pupils with different abilities should educated together.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is certainly said that group of students should be formed by schools on the basis of academic ability, while others say that students with distinctive abilities should be taught together. Although forming a group of students according to academic skill so that they can enhance better performance level, I believe that students with different capabilities must get education together because one student will get support from other to improve their learning skill.

On the one hand, students can grow their performance level if students divided in terms of academic capability because they have to compete with same academic level pupils. There is a belief that separating learners on the basis of academic skill will increase the speed of learning. For example, the majority of schools in Scotland grouping students according to the education skill because better teacher can be used for lower students to improve learning process. However, I believe that this will make sense of discrimination among them because weaker learner feel that they are dumb and not smart and not think good.

On the other hand, learners should get education in mixed class of ability because it will allow to give support each other to tackle their problems. For instance, two students get same score in reading test, but both have used different skills. One was good in comprehension and another was efficient in vocabulary. If they both studied together then they can share their learning process and will able to gain strong grip on both skills. Therefore, I think pupils with different skills should learn together because it will help student to learn one skill from another.

In conclusion, although class with one ability students will able to speed up of learning process, however, I believe that mixed class of ability will allow students to improve their weakness by getting support from others.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-21 pawan9667 67 view
2020-04-21 pawan9667 67 view
Essays by user pawan9667 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... for lower students to improve learning process. However, I believe that this will make...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'giving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: giving
... class of ability because it will allow to give support each other to tackle their prob...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eakness by getting support from others.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18892508143 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50191705721 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472312703583 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8054640423 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263278426066 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104728258802 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722725475837 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178859331202 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682202079862 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... for lower students to improve learning process. However, I believe that this will make...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'giving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: giving
... class of ability because it will allow to give support each other to tackle their prob...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eakness by getting support from others.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18892508143 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50191705721 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472312703583 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8054640423 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263278426066 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104728258802 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722725475837 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178859331202 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682202079862 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.