The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.
The line chart illustrates the number of visitors visited Malaysia and Dubai over a 9-year period from 1995 to 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that both countries Dubai and Malaysia increased significantly in terms of tourists visiting. However, from 2001 Malaysia showed a decreasing trend, while the figures in Dubai grew more visitors than Malaysia.
The number of visitors visiting Malaysia started with 100,000 in 1995 and then it increased gradually by approximately 10,000 visitors in 1996. After 1996, the figure of tourists went up moderately and reached to around 320,000 in 2001. However, from 2001 to 2003 the figure declined considerably by about 80,000.
About 40,000 tourists traveled to Dubai in 1995. Before it went up to just above 160,000 tourists in 1998, there was a gradual decrease in 1996 by 10,000 visitors. Similarly, from 1998 to 1999 there was a steady decline by around 20,000 in the number of visiting tourists in Dubai. Then, the figure of visitors rose dramatically to 320,000 from 1999 to 2001. However, before the figure reached to 400,00 in 2003, there was a gradual fall in 2002 by roughly 10,000 tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-21 | sannacoconutandmango | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | pawan9667 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | tronghuy230903 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | dwi angraeni hatik | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | Jinu Benny | 67 | view |
- The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below 73
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind the bars To what extent do you agree 56
- Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability but others believe pupils with different abilities should educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The natural resources such as oil forests and freshwater are being consuming at an alarming rate What problem does it cause How can we solve these problems 73
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind the bars To what extent do you agree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10052910053 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59310004752 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4928283547 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6363636364 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338824373325 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156225397178 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113711515144 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263588384704 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956557176397 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.