Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To a certain extent, it is argued having education and training for criminals is more effective to handle them rather than put them behind bars. Personally, I completely agree that prisoners gain more benefits by going through the process of learning and job training.
There are two main reasons why authorities tend to imprison people who commit an offence. One reason is that some criminals pose a threat to society. Therefore, they are put in prison to ensure the safety of other citizens. Furthermore, being isolated and separated from the community helps them reflect on their choices and their life. Thus, when they are released, they will have proper thinking about what to do and what not to. Take the actor who plays the iconic superhero figure, Iron Man, for example, he has served jail time for multiple drug-related charges but then, when he was out, he took part in several drug treatment programs since he had thought about his decisions while he was in jail. After that, he enjoyed a comeback and starred in several blockbuster films.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that everyone should be given a second chance to rethink their actions until they realize it and fix it. Because of this, convicts should receive education and vocational training so that they can learn personal skills and specific job skills to improve themselves. Since punishments and prisons could make criminals' behaviour worse, rehabilitation aims to make them better citizens. It is also seen that rehabilitated prisoners are less likely to re-offend.
In conclusion, for the reasons I mentioned above, I strongly believe that governments should consider offering offenders formal schooling and training programs to reform them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 95
- The table below shows information regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 100
- The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19081272085 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65032743976 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664310954064 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7245421196 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203913251004 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063996323594 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560313440091 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114199124414 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543682668288 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.