Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe which we live. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
The quench for knowledge is as old as the existence of mankind. Some people agree that space exploration is important to amass more information while others argue that it is not necessary. This essay will discuss both views and arrive at a logical conclusion.
To begin with, the advantages of space study are many such as, to forecast natural calamities and catastrophes, to discover natural resources to name few, but many. For example, there has been a reduction of the number of death in catastrophes after scientist predicted the disparity before months of occurrence, compare to the bygone days. Moreover, with the help of data gathered through this scientific advancement people were able to discover natural resources which were hidden under earth’s lap for a long time. This indeed, helped a lot for the invention of many useful resources.
On the contrary, the Government has other priories as well. For instance, education and health must be given paramount importance than space exploration as these are exorbitantly expensive. While some developed counties will have money for this, but many of the developing and underdeveloped counties are still struggling to cope up with many grievances. Consecutively, poor nations can ask help from elite nations to predict the environmental changes and other quires related to space as they have satellites which are able to notify everything happening everywhere.
After evaluating the above views it can be stated that space exploration is necessary however, spending a huge amount of money on it can be avoided by collaborating funding from different counties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The quench for knowledge is as old as the existenc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35408560311 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97586266542 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8941220254 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211243689567 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732218139667 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510326033953 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128433367255 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069211153152 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.