Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views regarding the legislation of road traffic about whether severe punishments or other methods have a noticeable implication in the accident rates. In my opinion, the former would be justified; however, the latter sounds more convincing.
On the one hand, It is evident that the implementation of strict punishment such as fees and probation actually affects driver’s awareness. To be specific, penalties act as a deterrent for reoffending, which in turn prevents drivers from repeating the unlawful act. Moreover, harsh punishments gain social endorsement in terms of controlling juvenile crimes. For example, those who disregard the law can have a life lesson if they are condemned.
On the other hand, there are other measures that can be adapted apart from strict punishment, which avoids crime motivation by dealing with the insight cause. One of them is improving the education standard, by that I mean, to cover students with adequate traffic theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Subsequently, governments or local councils could reduce road accidents by investing in better public transport like bus and train in case of driving incapability in drunks.
In conclusion, although strict punishments play a vital role in the criminal driving rates, those solutions analyzed above will eliminate all elements that include a person committing a crime. These methods are more comprehensive than the previous idea and are predicted to solve the problem thoroughly in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of 89
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 62
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, the latter sounds more convincing. On the one hand, It is evident that the ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a life lesson if they are condemned. On the other hand, there are other measu...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se of driving incapability in drunks. In conclusion, although strict punishmen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, apart from, for example, i mean, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55128205128 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99606786891 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6367215443 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.090909091 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26315163677 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767292420779 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493630802783 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138841428047 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649871901686 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.