Many people believe that life has become intolerable due to the development of technology. However, I am convinced that the opposite is true, and the complexity of life originates from different sources, not technology.
Technology, instead of making life more complicated as many people think, is a crucial factor forming the evolution of humanity. In terms of employment, the invention of computers, the Internet and various electronic devices has significantly improved our working productivity. At home, machines have freed people from time-consuming and mundane chores. In agricultural fields, technology not only helps farmers save their labour but also increase their crop yields. It can be said that the existence of technology our lives is so pervasive that people have taken it for granted. While it is true that a number of equipment or gadgets are excessively sophisticated to manipulate and require high skills to use, they are not the main reason making our live more complex.
In my opinion, overpopulation constitutes the major source of the extra complication of our life. The increasing strains put on both natural environment and human societies has become intolerable. In many parts of the world, the scarcity of healthy food, accommodation and job opportunities is caused by the overcrowded population, not technology. While people in those countries are scrambling for basic supplies and suffering from various illnesses, technology might play a superficial part in their lives. Besides, psychological factors also trouble some people, for they are obsessed by items or things that they do not really need or afford. Therefore, our lives would be simpler if we solve these problems, not by reducing the use of technology.
In conclusion, I am opposed to the idea that using less technology will make our lives simpler because the difficulties of life are caused by different reasons.
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 78
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food,clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 78
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, really, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38333333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10356604928 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4058473908 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228771289352 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696754789168 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486571599732 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144603954001 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335230541385 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.