Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether vital positions in the government should be taken by young adults. While high-level positions have been taken up by people with many years of work experience, I agree with those who believe that the government should also employ the youth as some important positions.
There is a key reason why the government should not hire young officials. In many people’s minds, the young generation is thought to be immature and inexperienced. If in charge of important departments, they might easily make decisions without thorough consideration, which may lead to dire consequences. A good example is that, the foreign affairs minister needs to quickly and properly handle the problems that may come from all over the world every minute. Without the rich experience collected from his long-time service in this field, it would be unlikely for him to fulfill his duties. Therefore, young people are not really suitable for this kind of government positions.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that young people should be given more opportunities to get involved in government work. The main benefit of hiring them is that they are open-minded, creative and willing to solve problems with new methods. In other words, if they notice that there are effective systems which are newly proposed, they will assess these systems instead of being confined by original measures. For instance, the education ministry and tourism bureau should be led by young people who are inspiring and innovating. They would be enthusiastic about using imaginative ways to attract students’ and visitors’ interests, which may lead to unexpected benefits.
In conclusion, experienced people are obviously appropriate for high-level government positions, but the young are equally essential for these positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Jenny213987 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays, most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people think personal happiness is closely related to economic success while others believe that it depends on other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46712802768 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93707428152 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0216379277 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303655057552 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11582312455 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104404881582 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210983096856 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557596402787 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.