Some people think that young people should follow older people's example. Others, however disagree and believe that its good to challenge older people's opinions and thoughts. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
The ever widening gap between the thinking of young and grey haired generation always leads to conflicts in the families and societies. According to some people, following the guidance and footsteps of old people is advisable for young people. By contrast, others are against to this view point and advocate that challenging the opinions and thoughts of old people yields fruitful results.
This essay intends to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are multifarious points to endorse the former view. First and the foremost, people of late adulthood are veterans and therefore following their examples always invites positive results. To demonstrate, old people have experienced many ups and downs in their lives. They have conducted plenty of experiments while dealing with critical situations. The experience gained from such experimentation has made them great thinkers, planners and wise decision makers. In addition, unlike young ones, grey haired people think more rationally as they have been through the realities of life.
Needless to say, the examples given by elderly people are worthwhile for youngsters in order to make superior decisions related to career and life. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They think that challenging the opinions and thoughts of old people is the need of the hour. To be specific, lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over recent decades. The ways of dealing with the problems and situations also require changes. The ideas of old people may not fit in the solutions to modern problems. Besides this, young people are less likely to become inventive, creative and innovative if they only follow the opinions of elderly people. Thus, following ideas or examples of elders is not an idea to be welcomed.
To recapitulate, undeniably, experienced older people are invaluable advisors. However, we cannot underestimate the opposite view point. In my perception, youngsters should not only follow the advice of elderly people but also think rationally and deliberately before making crucial decisions.
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 97
- Some people say that mobile phonesshould be banned in public places suchas libraries, shops and public transport.Do you agree or disagree? 75
- Some people prefer to watch live performances from their home on TV or online others prefer to be present at the event and experience it live Discuss both ways and give your opinion 74
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive. 80
- Museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not the local people. Why is this so? What could be done to encourage more local visitors? Please include relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4613003096 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77997889278 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3159138158 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.380952381 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385170595839 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103268660275 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090603123721 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179350740908 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087622957531 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.