Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?
The usage of cell phones has been prohibited in several schools. While these devices can undoubtedly play a role in safety, connectedness and even learning, many educational institutions have decided to ban mobiles within the school premises. In my opinion, I believe that it is a positive step that can bring benefits academically and improve health.
Restricting mobile use can improve learning. This is simply because, without these devices, there are far fewer distractions for both students and teachers. When a student has their phone in their lap or pocket, for instance, there is an irresistible urge to check constantly for texts, alerts or social media updates. Even the most observant teacher, cannot prevent them from sneakily checking the messages or scrolling through them when they become addicted. These endless distractions draw attention away from important educational matters and erode attention spans, which can long term effects on academic progress. A blanket ban on phones during class frees learners from this compulsive checking and allows them to focus.
Less phone usage may improve well being. In terms of health, phones can emit harmful radiation including IR rays which consequently would damage eyesight. A clear example illustrates extensive research done by Oxford University on how the time spent on screens, would affect vision. The results showed that greater screen time deteriorated the health of the eyes. Therefore, as a matter of fact, force children to wear glasses or even have surgery if some content in their eyes is damaged extensively. So, the prohibition of cell phones within school premises has a positive impact in terms of the pupils' health and safety.
In conclusion, having access to technology may have benefits, however, along with those facts are some drawbacks that may lead to low academic performance as well as damage to one's physical condition. It is recommended that the schools offer technological support to assist their students to broaden their knowledge, rather than encouraging everyone to have a mobile phone of their own.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | ImranMurtaza | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-10 | Revivo Tulaseket | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | teenieteens | 73 | view |
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider the rich are becoming richer and the poor are getting even poorer What problems can the situation cause What can be done to reduce this gap 77
- In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single sex schools or co educational schools Some people think that children going to single sex schools have disadvantages later in life To what extent do you agree 73
- ome people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry physics and history should be taught in schools while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking Discuss both views 78
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 89
- Wearing uniforms is popular in schools but some people argue that this might cause damage to children s individuality What is your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...s has a positive impact in terms of the pupils health and safety. In conclusion, ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36555891239 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7601457134 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640483383686 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.417021945 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.470588235 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243772230295 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681217986826 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589558807417 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135315428036 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306758106924 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.