Some think that governments should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
In the modern era, there has been considerable controversy whether the governments should provide subsidies for the retired or not. Whilst an army of individuals believe that there are numerous desirable consequences exerted from this tendency, I would argue that the elderly are capable of ensuring their well-being.
On the one hand, providing retired individuals with monetary support can be inessential and even bring about some adverse impacts. Evidently, it is the elderly that possess adequate experience and skills to manage their finances effectively. In fact, during the process of working, they can put aside enough money to cover the living expenses and make pragmatic plans for future expenditure; therefore, they can lead a comfortable life despite the small amount of pension and avoid being broke. Moreover, should there are authorities to support the seniors financially, some nations, especially the developing ones, will have to shoulder significant burden of debt from the industrialized countries. Instead, they should invest their spending on top priorities namely economy and education to thrive.
On the other hand, subsidies from the governments can derive benefits on both individual and societal levels. It is beyond doubt that the retired people are unable to make ends meet with the tiny amount of monthly pension. For example, in some Asian nations, the old-age groups only receive one tenth of the salaries earned while working; thus, they can not afford increasing living expenses. To make the matters worse, the elderly, whose health can be exacerbated in correlation with age, struggle to pay for the modern healthcare system that is extremely exorbitant; therefore, the need for governments’ financial support is plausible. Furthermore, helping the older generations with financial hardship is a feasible method to compensate for their long-life commitment and contribution to society. In addition to the amount of money the retired receive each month, health insurance is necessary to tackle such predicament. This method can also reflect the well-being of the citizens and the social welfare of one nation.
In conclusion, despite certain merits, I believe the tendency of providing the seniors subsidies after retirement can be redundant and adverse since the old individuals have the ability to manage their spending wisely to have lives of high quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-04 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Mphthao | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | hhoangsson | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-26 | sophiemetropolis | 78 | view |
- students giving good ratings 78
- Some think that governments should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 78
- table depicts the rate of people located in different regions 78
- Computers 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xerted from this tendency, I would argue that the elderly are capable of ensuring...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while working; thus, they can not afford increasing living expenses. To make the ...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to increase'.
Suggestion: to increase
...ile working; thus, they can not afford increasing living expenses. To make the matters wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50677506775 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85615771888 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3453974337 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.466666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168230016291 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558196343916 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372248477904 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957145450773 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351246846767 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.