Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Regarding the issue of leading abilities, there has been considerable controversy whether it is an inborn nature or not. From my perspective, albeit innate characteristics have vital role to play, I would incline that individuals can learn to become leaders.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that being leaders requires certain traits that can not be adopted during the process of growing up. In other words, some people are fortunately born with leaders’ qualities, which are inherent, namely boldness or authoritarian. As these personalities can not be learnt or mimic, it is plausible that the ability is somehow innate. In fact, merely a few people can possess the capability to inspire and connect people from all walks of life together. Furthermore, leaders are believed to stand out more easily irrespective of their ages. In fact, there have been many cases that primary students can lead a group effectively long before they have the opportunities to learn about leadership.
On the other hand, leadership skills can be formed through studying and training. It is beyond doubt that the requirement for leaders is considerably demanding. That is to say, should people aspire to become leaders, they must acquire profound knowledge and experience to come up with effective long-term and short-term strategies to tackle numerous predicaments. Evidently, in terms of company hierarchy, employees have more opportunities to get promotion for leading positions based on the period that they devoted to the conglomerates. Furthermore, it is discipline that is pivotal since leaders should abide by the rules and act as the role models for other members; thus, they must keep their self-control, which can not be attained without years of strict training.
In conclusion, while inborn personalities are contributory factors leading to leading competence, this skill can also be adopted via learning and training.
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 78
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 84
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- maps 84
- impacts on tourism 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38870431894 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03880125824 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607973421927 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3790248383 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192971092888 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672250431268 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494771985329 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105407701573 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542814858406 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.