Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a possitive or negative development?
Besides offline course which delivered on campus, now some colleges provide distance learning courses which implement through internet. I believe that this trend have more possitive effect than drawback.
On the one hand, there are some diadvantages of distance learning courses development. The first resons is that, the education quality might be reduced due to online student lack the study environment and needed infrastructures such as library, laboratory. As a result, distance learning students could not assess with invaluable knowledge in huge libraries of universities and mordern equipments of laboratories which play a pivotal role in their academic researches. Furthermore, online course students might lack some vital skills due to the course only focus on provide knowledge. By inteaction with professors and classmates through artificial devices, online course students could not enhance their presentation skills and discussion skills.
On the other hand, I believe the benefits of online courses are outweights the drawbacks. Firstly, distance learning courses offer a golden opportunity for busy people who would like to pursue higher education. For example, a married woman who is always busy with her job and her household chores could not go to school to attend a training course now might broaden her knowledge through online course conveniently. Secondly, students in developing countries would save a huge amount of money which it is spent for living expenses in wealthy nations such as England, American, Canada. For instance, besides high tuition fee, the expenditure of students for house rental, foods each year is very high. In contrast, by distance learning, those students can assess with world level university but with a very low cost.
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of distance learning courses, It seems to me that the benefits of e-learning are should not underestimated.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-03-09 | vu thi tuoi | 78 | view |
2017-03-09 | vu thi tuoi | 73 | view |
- Mobile phones and the Internet are very useful for old people However this section of population is the fewer users of mobile phones and the Internet In what ways can mobile phones and the Internet be useful to the old people How can the old people be enc 84
- The maps below show information about the change of Riverdole College 30 years ago and now 88
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited Do Advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both view and give your opinion? 55
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is increase the price of fuel. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'underestimate'
Suggestion: underestimate
...e benefits of e-learning are should not underestimated.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57288135593 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86507864952 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8564724471 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17770999339 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653642005948 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043499445781 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109195180983 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553178426359 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.