The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is increase the price of fuel. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some people belive that rising the price of fossil fuel is the most effective way to tackle with global environmental issues. While I accept that the higher price of traditional energy resources is a great method to address environmental pollution, I support the view that developing recycle energy resources is the best countermeasure to handle with environmental problems.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why enhance the prize of fossile fuel will have a positive effect to environment. One reason is that, if the consummers are hit in their pockets by charging a higher prize for natural resources, they will save energy as much as they can. For example, consumers might choose their cars which smaller and lower engine capacity to save oil or gasoline. Furthermore, using public transports instead of private vehicles could be an increasingly popular trend when fuel expense is increase. For instant, in Vietnam the fuel prize is expensive in comparison with Vietnamese income, therefore young citizens have a tendency to use public bus system to reduce their transportation costs. As a result, the amount of cacbon dioxide which generate from private cars and motocycles could be dropped to a lower level.
On the other hand, alternative energy is the best tremendous countermeasure to address global environmental crisis such as global warming, depleted natural resources and air pollution. Firstly, if environmentally friendly energy sources such as solar, wave, wind were used to generate electricity, the significant environmental aspects which are created by coal plants would not occur. As a result, the harmful impacts of green house gases emissions, solid wastes and water discharge could be reduced. Secondly, if reasearches on hydogen engines are successful, it will be an enormous revolution in environmental protection. The hydogen engines, will not create greenhouse gases emission but creat oxygen and water when it operating. The concentration of cacbon dioxy in the atmosphere will be dropped to a much lower rate.
In conclusion, althought imposing more expensive fossil fuel could be an effective solution to solve the global environmental issues, I believe that we should focus in alternative energy projects to tackle those problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-02 | Sunny udhani | 39 | view |
| 2017-03-27 | vu thi tuoi | 78 | view |
| 2017-03-27 | vu thi tuoi | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Mobile phones and the Internet are very useful for old people However this section of population is the fewer users of mobile phones and the Internet In what ways can mobile phones and the Internet be useful to the old people How can the old people be enc 84
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a possitive or negative development? 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a possitive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41971830986 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01342628063 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8897228872 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.266666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129144711405 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432311517706 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442983385747 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892174591253 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443106439908 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.