Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The cutting edge technology and the increasing enhancement of the Internet have brought drastic shifts to the way people work or study. Online courses now are one of the most common choices for university students rather than attending classes on campus. Despite many significant advantages we gain from this, I particularly fancy classroom-based learning.
To begin with, being world-wide and able to connect from every corner of the world, the digital online platform is being taken advantage of by several young researchers, especially those pursuing undergraduate degrees, to conduct their researches and projects. It is undeniable that this approach allows them to have more flexibility in terms of course alternative and time management. As a matter of fact, online courses offer a wide range of subjects from business administration to genetic biology or civil engineering. This way, students have better chances to get exposed to their genuine interests and hobbies, making their decision in future career wiser and more suitable.
On the other hand, the traditional teaching method in association to interaction between students and teachers in classroom is well known for its efficiency in fostering children’s creativity and interpersonal skills. By the time students spend quality time with their peers, it is their social network that will be expanded by participating in classroom live discussions and presentations in public. Lecturers or professors, in addition, are considered to be such a reliable source of knowledge and advice not only in academic fields but also in practical experience. Therefore, students having formal academic education in universities are more likely to succeed in the future.
In conclusion, whereas numerous benefits accumulated if choosing distance learning are remarkable, campus-delivered studying would be a better option since it provides students with a totally different perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | mikeboss268 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Billynguyen1225 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Lê Thị Hoài Như | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | hakinguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
- Today in many countries people can live and work anywhere they choose because of improved communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs.What problems this causes? What are solutions? 61
- A large number of young people cannot find jobs after they leave school. What problems will youth unemployment cause in individual and for society? What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among young people? 89
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or c 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to distance'
Suggestion: to distance
...merous benefits accumulated if choosing distance learning are remarkable, campus-deliver...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6941580756 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18174832377 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6735395189 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7237420531 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131766241544 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485296570841 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560126435656 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766924336944 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458217271411 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.