Some young people look forward to a year of traveling, a "gap year", before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others this is an expensive waste of time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some students want to spend a gap year traveling and consider it as an opportunity to expand their knowledge before they start to work or go to college. However, others think this action is costly and a waste of time. Despite sympathizing with the latter opinion, I would support the first one.
There are two reasons why young people object to this idea. First of all, traveling is a pricey activity and it is not suitable for everyone. For example, many students have a difficult financial situation, they can not afford a trip even if they work part-time. Their source of income may be only enough to meet their basic needs. Secondly, when teenagers take a year to travel, they may not be able to keep up with their classmates. By the time they graduate, their peers have already worked one year, so teens can get less chance of finding a paid-well job. For these downsides, taking a gap year is opposed by a number of people.
In contrast, I suppose that travel experiences do bring benefits to young people. Having a trip is necessary for adolescents after a long time studying exhaustedly. Next, they will see a different world and gain numerous new attitudes for themselves. Moreover, if juveniles travel on their own, they can learn to solve independently every problem. For instance, they may know how to pay bills appropriately or take care of themselves when there are unexpected situations happen. Apart from that, teens will get these precious experiences for their future lives.
To sum up, although the gap year has some drawbacks such as being expensive and a waste of time. I believe that it is an excellent chance for students who want to try an independent life and broaden their horizons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | anh801 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | linhlinh11 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-17 | namviet | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Ngoc Trinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | akorn99 | 89 | view |
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The graph below gives information from one 2018 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2023 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 84
- The ghraph below shows the three different kinds of emission source oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, i suppose, in contrast, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65940830263 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614864864865 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9589786907 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6666666667 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38534884359 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107148901332 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576907931191 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237694328127 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493141033673 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.