In spite of the advancements made in agriculture, many people around the world, still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Famine is a global issue. Despite the significant progress in farming, starvation has not been thoroughly eradicated. There are several reasons behind this disturbing phenomenon as in the rising food price and changing weather patterns, which may be solved by substantial aid programs to the poor and GM crops.
The reasons for global starvation can be manifold. Advanced farming machines have made agriculture faster and easier, which should exert positive impacts on food prices. However, there are still impoverished individuals who cannot afford sufficient nutrients due to their rocketing prices stemming from inflation. Put simply, the more expensive foods become, the more people remain hungry. Take Iran, which is a well-developed country in terms of agriculture, as an example. Iranian underprivileged families cannot purchase adequate foods due to inflation, so they suffer from malnourishment. Secondly, agriculture is extremely vulnerable to climate change, which ranges from drought to heavy rain. That, inevitably, causes insufficient food sources for some nations which are highly exposed to widespread floods or long scratches of drought. For instance, India's farming is highly dependent on monsoon rainfall, so the lack of monsoon rain spells disaster for people.
Solving these matters requires concerted efforts. Addressing the first issue, not only do governments need to keep foods’ prices under constant surveillance but they are also obliged to provide a subsidized canteen for the poor. Moreover, genetically modified crops that can withstand extreme weather conditions should come into consideration. If enough crops, despite the harsh weather, were yielded, the distribution of food with reasonable prices would be even; therefore fewer people would suffer from constant hunger.
To conclude, hunger continues to haunt millions of people unless governments and scientists set the wheels in motion. High food prices and adverse weather conditions have dire consequences on global hunger, which can be eradicated by introducing cheaper foods or high-yielding crops like GM.
- Many people think that zoos are cruel Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Tell some measures to avoid the risks involved 92
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin a foreign language of primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In spite of the advancements made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be a case Do you think this is a positive or negative solution 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires concerted" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'concerting' or 'to be concerted'.
Suggestion: concerting; to be concerted
...people. Solving these matters requires concerted efforts. Addressing the first issue, no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r foods or high-yielding crops like GM.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79032258065 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93137074477 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683870967742 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5990581688 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917078844002 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271207929823 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029930359775 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547688451412 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110534369149 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.