In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Agricultural techniques have been advanced over the past centuries. This brings us adequate nutrients and motivation to our lives. Although these advances, few people are still struggling with their diets. Lots of reasons like regions or wars could have been a significant repercussion on the problem. Thus, we have to concentrate on peace and safety to stop it.
Advances in agriculture have been a enormous impact on sufficient energy for us, however, some are dying due to a starvation. No crops are able to grow even agricultural techniques have evolved. Like Africa, where no much water, too high in temperature, have not had any opportunities to devote developments. For instance, counties near the equator, except Africa, have reputation for great crop producing countries, especially countries in Asia. They have perfect land for crop even with burning temperature; Where the difference comes from is a region. Regional advantages, rainy during summer, take their people to adequate nutrients.
Secondly, wars and violence lead people a poverty and/or starvation. Nobody is able to wait for the crops with caring and love to harvest them during violence. Imagine from news that correspondents convey how situation goes terrible especially in Middle East, Africa, Mexico etc. Another example that when I asked to grandmother in regard to Korean war, 1950-1953, she hardly replied many died by starvation, lost family and even crimes went very high in percentage. We do have to stop the tragedies for everyone’s happiness.
In conclusion, not all the people have been experiencing agricultural advances due to regional and unpeaceful behaiviors. Therefore, well-developed countries need to focus on the globe for peaceful world, so that all nations thrive for their people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Pirate7 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | jin96 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Bunheehee98 | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | hur hyeon bin | 50 | view |
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Advances in agriculture have been a enormous impact on sufficient energy fo...
^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...niques have evolved. Like Africa, where no much water, too high in temperature, ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47482014388 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02463018642 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1176354497 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0697282972219 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244810491406 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263920441055 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501072505267 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313917729015 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.