Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
These days, students leave high school without learning how to arrange money. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
On the one hand, students lack a general knowledge about managing their money. The reason for this is that they are not taught about it in high school. Many schools do not have a course curriculum including personal financial control. This leads to a lack of information and learning for graduates, who often pay anything for their superiority. In addition, parents do not care much about their descendants. Some of them also do not have a fully extended grasp of financial management to guide their kids, while others are so rich that they allow and provide for their children without squandering money. At this age, graduates are easily exposed to toxic friends or addictive substances.
There are a number of viable solutions to tackling this problem. Firstly, school programs should include a financial arrangement course to educate them how to control funds effectively. The lessons about this will help students have a cognition switch and plural sight. For instance, they will have priority when spending what is necessary first, and step by step, they will round themselves out. On top of that, parents should limit the money they give their descendants because they take on the big role of raising children. The parents have to guide their child about managing money, or they can seek out some courses on the internet about this problem. They also lead their child's work, for example, in a company or a coffee shop, not only providing an incentive but also knowing the value of money.
In conclusion, although money management is a problem for many school leavers, there are a number of viable solutions to counteract this problem.
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals 61
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00324675325 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51399146005 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2711690099 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6470588235 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434208289913 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141983716203 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102746486635 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297791084947 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940271794867 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00324675325 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51399146005 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2711690099 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6470588235 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434208289913 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141983716203 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102746486635 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297791084947 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940271794867 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.