studies show that criminals get a low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Firstly, vocational education is usually hailed as a key to prevent prison inmates from coming into contact with the law again. Based on global statistics, prison inmates who acquired some necessary occupational skills reveal a relevantly lower law infringement after resuming their ordinary lives. The reason seems clear: having access to secure job positions and earning substantially obviates the need to break the law to live a life.
Secondly, learning can change people's mindset as it is proven that our brain is plastic enough even after maturity. It has been scientifically proven that humans' brain is able to be reshaped over the lifespan. The provenance of a majority of these criminals is penniless families who could not afford a decent education before being handcuffed. Believing in the ability of these criminals, especially those of petty crimes, makes it fair enough to be exposed to education as a way for rehabilitation. Thus, the opportunity to introduce prisoners to a new perception of life should be embraced by authorities.
By contrast, prison education programs are not without opposition and there is often little public sympathy for prisoners. Arguments made against prison education mostly include that inmates do not deserve the right to be educated; doing so is being "soft on crime", and that it is a waste of taxpayers' money. However, it should be noted that this provided training is a rewarding remedy which might save more than it costs since it is can bring criminals to repentance.
To conclude, prison education not only can change an individual's personality but also it will teach them some necessary skills to work after their release. Hence, this will reduce recidivism as a prior goal of incarceration, so it seems advisable to fund such a means in order to keep communities safe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-28 | kamalena | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
- Essay Smart devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. The benefits of this development are obvious, but what are the drawbacks? has been updated. 78
- Every one of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today In the not too distant future technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom Do you agree or disagree with this statement 83
- Some believe the primary purpose of museums is to entertain people while others believe their purpose is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 81
- All over the world, the number of overweight people is growing. What do you feel are the main causes of this? What are the effects? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...since it makes criminals more employable . My sentiment is on pair with this opini...
^^
Line 10, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...prison education not only can change an individuals personality but also it will teach them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17589576547 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82858178895 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7801654164 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.933333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199297366732 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575406120538 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387845684078 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935758210476 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178328794548 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.