• Task 2: It is a natural process that animal species such as dinosaurs become extinct. There is no reason for people to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
The extinction of animal species such as dinosaurs is referred to as a natural process. Therefore, people do not need to prevent that. I disagree with this point of view because of some reasons.
It is transparent that human is one of the reasons leading to the disappearance of animal species. To begin with, the deforestation making place for housing reduces the living space of wild animals. Therefore, it is harder for animals to find a place to live as they sometimes must fight with others which makes the population of some species decrease. Moreover, that people contaminate the environment also results in the extinction of animal species. For example, a company released untreated waters into the environment and that lead to the death of thousands of fishes found on the coach.
It is also beneficial for a human being to help animal species get rid of becoming extinct. First, the prevention from the disappearance of species can keep the balance of the ecosystem which is also positive to human, a specie living on the earth. In an ecosystem, every animal involves others for living and growing such as preys and hunters so the absence of some species can cause the lack of food for their hunters or the escalating population of their prey. Subsequently, that has a negative effect on people, for instance, some bears go to the city in order to seek food, which is dangerous, irritating. Second, the extinction of many animal species also means that people lose some resources of food. Nowadays, people’s lives are secured by meat products such as pork, beef, fish and so on but if this supplement does not exist, it is the end for a human being.
In conclusion, it is reasonable for people to keep the occurrence of animal species because they play an important role in their life.
- Task 2 People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 1 The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 56
- Task 1 The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83495145631 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71501555708 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527508090615 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5936875866 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341763564387 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123986627756 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870329478891 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228700368376 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993520896005 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.