Task 2: In many countries, the quality of life of people in large cities are becoming worse. What is the reason? And measures could be taken to solve this problem.
It is true that the people living’s standard in big cities is more and more decreasing in many countries. While there are many reasons to explain for this view, the solutions should be applied to resolve for this issue.
There are two key reasons why the quality of life of residents in large cities is become negative. The first reason for this is that the development of manufacture industry have bad impacts on environment. This means that production activities pollute and litter many rubbish such as metal and even waste liquid, which lead to pollution problems in cities. Another clear reason is that the migration of the large number of people from countryside to city. This is because the lack of work in the suburban areas. As a result, it is difficult to ensure the quality of services in term of education and health because of overload. For example, people have to spend a long time to wait for using health services in cities of Vietnam.
The effective measures should be taken to improve the quality of resident’s life in cities. Firstly, Governments should invest money in many fields which help boost the quality of life in city. This is conducted by building and widening facilities such as hospitals, schools and public transport. Secondly, companies and individuals have to take responsibilities to protect their surrounding. This means that they need to control their production activities and limit the bad behaviors which have bad impacts on the environment. For example, Adidas use recycled plastic to produce their shoes, which not only reduce the pollution but also enhance their public image.
In conclusion, there are two main reasons to account for this situation and practical methods must be implemented to tackle for this phenomenon as well
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-15 | hoangquang | 58 | view |
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- task 1: the consumption of Chicken, Fish over the period of 25 years 78
- task 1: marriage and divorce 67
- task 1: The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030. 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08503401361 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76287012719 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2438667986 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298635257347 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093488465162 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721935767399 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175294468387 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573228979544 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.