• Task 2: People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is supposed that people who persist on a career path tend to have a more ideal working life compared to those who switch jobs frequently. From my perspective, I mostly concur with this attitude because of some reasons I have mentioned below.
It is advisable for people to stick with a career path in their lives as it brings many advantages for them. To begin with, pursuing only a job in life means that they can have more experiences in a particular field. The more time they work in a career, the more problems they have faced and that creates the diversity in their experiences, skills. Thanks to that, they can tackle more adverse tasks in their work and gain more repetition, earn more money. In addition, working in an aspect for a long time can expand their relationship network in that field, which helps them easily access up-to-date knowledge. For example, a person who works a career for many years makes friends with a lot of co-workers and they share the newest development and teach how to apply it in work to each other. Consequently, their work can be improved significantly.
Moreover, people are suggested to follow a career in all their lives because of other reasons. First, they can work in a more comfortable, similar environment than those who change jobs frequently. People who want to experience many jobs usually have the feeling of isolation, shock when meeting new bosses, co-workers, work culture and that certainly takes them a long period to adjust to a new environment. In contrast, people who work stably in a career do not need to deal with this problem and have more time to enhance their ability.
In conclusion, it is transparent that workers with only a career path in their lives tend to have more ideal jobs than those who change it frequently because they can have more experiences, relationships and time to improve themselves.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-14 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
2021-10-29 | oscar_666 | 11 | view |
2021-10-04 | HelenPr | 78 | view |
2021-09-26 | kiran sanghera | 61 | view |
2021-09-26 | kiran sanghera | 61 | view |
- Task 2 The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Task 2 More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Task 2 Many people believe that watching a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information b 78
- Task 2 Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nships and time to improve themselves.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82098765432 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69544654905 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496913580247 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7706082483 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38948694685 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157396080639 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983892596977 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289836696996 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458274978744 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.