Is there any value in studying academic subjects that are not “useful” in terms of generating wealth for the country?
Many people say that an useful education is one of the factors that creates affluence for the nation. However, the definition of “useful” is not clear if we are still under the impression that academic subjects are helpful only when they can generate prosperity. In my opinion, I strongly argue that academic subjects do not directly generate great wealth but they are still useful in some ways.
Some subjects are functional in their own fields. For example, linguistics means study how language works. This field is used to research how to teach language more effectively. In the period of international integration, commination is necessary which helps having better trading relations and can turn into generating wealth. Another subject such as archaelogy, which exams the remains of old objects to learn more about the societies and peoples of the past. Most of the studies will be displayed in museums, it can attract tourists who generate income for country’s tourism.
There also many subjects are useful in terms of meeting people’s hobbies. There are subjects that become common to people such as astronomy, which is a scientific study of the stars, planets and other natural objects in space. Some people are interested in understanding the planet they are living on while others are excited about discovering other planets of the solar system. These academic subjects are having the task of fulfilling human’s curiousity.
To summarize, any academic studies have its value, some are used to enrich the country but some are used to satisfy people’s need. Therefore, every academic subjects should be held in high regard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-24 | lili__nhnh | 73 | view |
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend 78
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television The graph covers the period between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 59
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Many people say that an useful education is one of the factors ...
^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to have' or 'have'.
Suggestion: to have; have
...n, commination is necessary which helps having better trading relations and can turn i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... task of fulfilling human’s curiousity. To summarize, any academic studies have ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23863636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70289770279 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2392468545 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406239645112 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121929542082 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714418400169 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23629109249 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536708891326 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Many people say that an useful education is one of the factors ...
^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to have' or 'have'.
Suggestion: to have; have
...n, commination is necessary which helps having better trading relations and can turn i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... task of fulfilling human’s curiousity. To summarize, any academic studies have ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23863636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70289770279 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2392468545 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406239645112 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121929542082 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714418400169 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23629109249 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536708891326 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.