There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce, and money is the most important factor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s society, it is argued that the crucial factors making people continue to go to work are based on the size of the salary offered. I wholly oppose this viewpoint since I assume that other factors are equally important.
To begin with, there are two main reasons for this belief that are vital elements to keeping people in employment. It is undeniable that their income meets their basic needs, such as paying for bills or providing their lives with articles of daily necessity, which allows them to have a reasonable quality of life. Another reason is that a stable wage allows them to satisfy their demand for entertaining activities. Due to an increasingly competitive job market, employees require a place to unwind and relax after being under heavy stress as well as workload. For instance, it is obvious why the roadway is always crowded at the weekend, as that is the time of week they may engage in entertaining activities that recharge their energy. Therefore, their work productivity and mood are enhanced.
Nevertheless, I also believe that other motivators are just as important in order to stay in the workforce. First and foremost, the prospect of advancement, of being assigned to a better position within a company, is a motivating factor. I mean that they will have a satisfactory working life, which helps them gain their ambitions along with getting a pay rise. In other words, an incentive scheme is a form of reward that managers use to motivate and retain team members. On top of that, a sense of job satisfaction comes from their professional achievements, such as developing a variety of skills and abilities or accumulating hands-on experience. Therefore, the desire to become a better version of themselves should stimulate individuals to remain in the labour force.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea that money is the prime motivator for employees to stay in the workforce. It is apparent that other conditions like fringe benefits, job promotion also play an indispensable role in remaining employed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | student-a | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 89
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 36
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 78
- The chart below shows information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...cheme is a form of reward that managers use to motivate and retain team members. On...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07941176471 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88938368208 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597058823529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1553779623 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120081525003 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413256990728 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550907358488 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854773175644 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456150786373 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.