There are some motive for people to work. Some people think money is the most important. Do you agree or disagree?
Now-a-days plethora of people do some kind of work in their daily life. some folk claim that people do work for some reason, while others reckon that money play a paramount role in the individual's life for work. I firmly agree with the given statement and this reasons for my inclination is mention in trail paragraphs.
To commence with, the predominant factor which cannot be ignored is, people do work for some other reasons like to follow their passion because people are more willing to do work in which they are interested and money is no matter for them. As a result, they can do more productive work and get job satisfaction. To illustrate, according to the survey conducted by the Indian company name Larsen and Turbo in 2017 revealed that 27% of employers enjoying their life balance reason it, they are more willing to do work. Moreover, people do work to complete target related programmes. Since, they wish to get perks, incentives and progression which is not in form of money but appreciation to their work.
However, another pivotal facet of this argument is about money, which fulfill the requirements of an any individual by financial rewards. Owing to the fact that, money have the power which gives the better lifestyle and reduce poverty rate. For instance, Indian government measures the ratio of poverty in 2017 which declined by 77% compared to 2005. Thus, by earning handsomely it shows the country's welfare. In addition to this, by earning money is equal to motivate the humans to do work hard and hit the companies mission and vision.
In conclusion, it is inferred that, despite follow the passion, target related program for perks and incentives, I believe financial rewards, pay increment to reduce poverty and better lifestyle are well logically admissible.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-13 | mickey96 | 56 | view |
2021-05-13 | Manan patel | 73 | view |
2021-05-12 | Manan patel | 78 | view |
2019-07-04 | Kanika Aggarwal | 86 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below show the comparison of age structure in India and France in 1982
- The below graph compare the age structure of India and France in 1984 84
- The numbers of cars keeps increasing So road should be expand some people think the government should pay of it while other think the car owners should pay for it Discuss both this views and give your opinion 76
- Below graph show comparison of age structure in India and France in 1984 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... some kind of work in their daily life. some folk claim that people do work for some...
^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...that money play a paramount role in the individuals life for work. I firmly agree with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... the humans to do work hard and hit the companies mission and vision. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99333333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59958116285 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7484603765 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348978730844 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12096683294 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118077614954 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197314142944 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144667759269 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.