There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.
What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?
There seems to be a variety of confirmations that human activities in various fields are being associated with the rising in temperable on the global scale. From my perspective, the man-made factors that attributed to global warming are diverse and, consequently, actions should be taken to tackle this worrisome tendency
On the one hand, human activities may have several adverse impacts on the global temperature. One fundamental influence that is worth considering is the greenhouse effect. It is particularly significant that the booming in the number of residential accommodations, together with numerous other types of institutions, made a great contribution to the dramatic soaring of heat globally since hot air flows are being trapped in a concrete jungle and cannot evaporate. Furthermore, the excessive utility of air-conditioning should also take responsibility as a colossal amount of heat is being discharged on the daily basis. Another severe effect caused by man-made actions is deforestation. In many nations throughout the world, especially the undernourished ones, trees are being cut down in large scale with the purpose of meeting the demands for timbers and agricultural land. Evidently, flora play a pivotal role in conditioning, therefore, the decrease in trees is synonymous with the climb in temperature
Unfortunately, there is no easy answer for this hassle. Nevertheless, one solution can be taken is to raise awareness among the population about the importance of the environment through television. There is not a shadow of a doubt that this catastrophe requires the concerted effort of every segment of the society, start with the smallest actions to minimizing the use of air-conditioners. On the other hand, proper urban planning in order to limit the construction of greenhouses can also be a good means of diminishing global temperatures.
In conclusion, the rising in temperature on the global scale results from the excessive usage of air-conditioner, which add a further complication to greenhouses effect, and the deforestation. Therefore, citizens throughout the world need to minimize the use of this appliance as well as appropriate urban planning should be taken into consideration to restrict the emerge of greenhouses
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-31 | Nanddy | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | Kubraguran | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | Kubraguran | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | dhanga | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | anna103 | 78 | view |
- traveling 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- It is irrefutable that in modern society the tendency of spending an enormous amount of time striving for work has become more prevalent than ever From my perspective this phenomenon resulted from plenty of causes and I find no justification to support th
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons for this and what can be doen to solve this issue 73
- Nowadays children watch too much TV Why is this happening and what can be done to prevent it 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...be taken into consideration to restrict the emerge of greenhouses
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53448275862 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41186233569 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566091954023 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6587931292 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.153846154 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263973973418 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850691472038 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060914146629 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160247255705 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711033546277 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.