These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What are reasons for it Do you think this is a positive or a negative development

Nowadays, there is a major change in family structure with the men do housekeeping usually while their spouses earn the family income. In my opinion, there are two main reasons that lead to this phenomenon, and, in general, this could be regarded as a positive trend.
To begin, there are two major causes for the phenomenon of a househusband. The first reason is the development of gender equality. Evidently, when there is no workplace discrimination, women can serve in some areas which used to be dominated by men, such as in manufacturing or government. Consequently, when they get well-paid jobs as well as have high social status, they tend to try hard in order to climb the career ladder instead of taking a role as a babysitter or housewife. Moreover, nowadays, people do not need to come to the office for work. With the popularity of online working, some male employees choose to stay at home while their wives remain in their careers.
In my opinion, the trend of male householders can bring several benefits. First, changing roles in the family structure can bring couples closer. To be more specific, sharing household chores and caring for children can help both partners understand their spouses more deeply and reduce conflicts in the family. Furthermore, males can be fully involved in parenting with their unique characteristics such as decision making or assertiveness. These skills, in combination with females’ intrinsic qualities of patience and compassion, will be a perfect upbringing for children in such families.
In conclusion, the development of gender equality and the advance of technology are two main factors involved in the popularity of male homemakers. And this trend can help form a harmonized family and has positive influences on children’s development.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, in general, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21333333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05152785047 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0510807711 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2030334185 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620295729592 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482578375467 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116157166425 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201587400344 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.