These days, older people who have retired often choose to spend money on themselves (for example on holidays) rather than save money for their children. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, senior retirees frequently opt to invest money on trips, rather than saving money for their children. Personally, I would assert that this issue leads to more disadvantageous aspects for some plausible reasons which I will explicate in the elucidate paragraph.
First, the demerits of allocating retirement-related money on holiday can lead to conflict and emotional estrangement within familial relationships, primarily due to loss of the inheritance wealth to pass down to their offspring. Consequently, certain family members might perceive themselves as neglected and undervalued. Moreover, their children’s futures would be impacted if elders were unable to pay for their future career opportunities due to significant financial challenges in pursuing it. Take American young adults as examples, talented children aspiring to enroll in universities stumble on paying for tuition fees.
On the other hand, this issue renders several merits which oldsters can allocate money for medical care, including regular health check-ups and physical therapy can manage health conditions. Seemingly, access to high-quality medical services spend an amount of dollars to ensure timely and necessary care. As seen in Denmark, a large part of the pension is spent by retirees to purchase more health insurance and increased services so that they can reach private healthcare. In addition, renovating their own homes helps elderly individuals to stay comfortably in them. This is crucial for enhancing accessibility, especially for those with limited mobility. For example, seniors can install safety-enhancing gadgets (CCTV) and stairlifts to access the upper floors without any risks.
Overall, despite this view carrying out a number of merits at some points, I would contradict that focusing on personal expenditures brings more unfavourable drawbacks ranging from family disputes to inadequate financial expenditures for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
- These days older people who have retired often choose to spend money on themselves for example on holidays rather than save money for their children Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In the past most people worked for small businesses while more people now work for large businesses What are the advantages and disadvantages of working for large businesses 80
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 100
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...g money for their children. Personally, I would assert that this issue leads to m...
^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...spects for some plausible reasons which I will explicate in the elucidate paragra...
^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... out a number of merits at some points, I would contradict that focusing on perso...
^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes to inadequate financial expenditures for children.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86925795053 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12886702141 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696113074205 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2813386631 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.769230769 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267298390651 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871166604105 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800885739653 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158199391133 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721099260892 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.