These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems.
In recent years, throw-away culture has caused many problems in modern society. The following essay will discuss a number of factors contribute to this tendency and the consequences of it.
The main factor causing throw-away culture is the changing in consumer habit. It can be seen that in modern society, individual buyers are often focused on the current market trend of a product rather than its quality. As a result of it, they prefer to use items in a short time period to avoid their products to become obsolescent. For example, with the advent of a new smartphone, many customers will prefer to purchase a new one despite the fact that their old mobile phones may still in good conditions.
Another major contributor to throw-away culture is the business practice of manufacturers. From the perspective of producers, mass producing of short-lived items causes a reduction in the price of goods and it might increase the clients’ desire to purchase. Therefore, manufacturers could improve their profit if they can sell a larger quantity of their goods to consumers.
It is undoubtedly that the throw-away society is causing many problems. The first negative effect is that overconsumption of short-lived goods may cause a waste of buyers’ money. The valuable financial resources of individuals should be spent on more essential aspects of life such as education, health care and medical treatment. Another negative impact is that raw materials are being exploited by the manufacturers to serve the mass producing of goods. It may lead to serious consequences to the environment such as deforestation and shortage of valuable resources.
In conclusion, a throw-away culture can create financial problems for individual customers and it poses devastation to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | nguyenken91 | 67 | view |
- In many part of the world people do research in their family history Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is an useful thing to do Other however it is better to focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and give 82
- Government should invest on teaching science subjects (maths, engineering, science, technology) rather than other subject (art, literature, history, language) for country develop and progress . To what extend do you agree or not agree. 73
- Our life has become more complex due to modern technology Some people think that we should do without modern technology and live a simpler life Do you agree or disagree 56
- The process of producing smoking fish 61
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both and give opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34154929577 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12887728124 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8295673376 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220472068755 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829225217397 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928332479917 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121203573518 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227968611022 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.