Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
In recent years, tourism industry is thriving in many developing nations. The following essay will explain possible reasons causing this phenomenon and describe the benefits associated with it.
It is undeniable that tourism is a lucrative business in many parts of the world. If a tourist attraction entices many travelers, it would receive a huge amount of investment to develop accommodation such as hotel, motel and inn to serve the increasing demand of visitors. As a result of this, the tourism industry could employ many local people to work as service providers to tourists and it helps developing countries to reduce the unemployment rate. Another reason is that tourism requires less initial capital for the government to develop the industry. In many developing nations, it is difficult to establish manufacturing industry due to lack of human resources, capital investment and raw materials. Therefore, tourism, which is a service-based industry, is an optimal choice for developing countries because it requires less initial upfront investment than other industries.
Overall, the tendency to expand tourism by the government brings many benefits to the local population. It offers a valuable opportunity for the local citizens to earn sufficient salary by providing services to visitors. Another positive development is that travel industry could help developing nations to advertise and promote their culture to other people around the world. It might encourage knowledge-sharing, create business connections and improve the relationship between local people and foreigners. Despite these benefits, there are negative impacts caused by a booming tourism industry such as pollution, invasion of inappropriate culture and vandalism in tourist places. However, the financial benefits gained from visitors could fully compensate for the drawbacks.
In conclusion, many developing countries are expanding tourism because it could bring many positive impacts on the local people and their economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | KhangEriol | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | elveslord77 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | elveslord77 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | hazelng1410 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | nguyenken91 | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both and give opinion. 56
- The process of producing smoking fish 61
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems. 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 79
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extend family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...vice providers to tourists and it helps developing countries to reduce the unemployment ra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ment is that travel industry could help developing nations to advertise and promote their ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73578595318 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02526062959 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551839464883 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3167546274 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320510980552 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108260329497 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941794302178 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218707289155 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873356482629 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.