Today, in many countries, there is insufficient respect for old people. What are the reasons? What problem it might cause? How this socio-economic problem can be solved?
As a result of technology and globalization, people are leading a monotonous and busy life, as a result, there is no room for the relationship and emotional attachment. Old aged people are considered as a burden in most of the counties. This essay will first discuss the problem in detail and secondly will rule out the causes. Finally, will try to suggest some possible solution to overcome this predicament.
Firstly, the thrust of the issue lies in the lifestyle change and generation cultural lag due to this younger generation are blindly following the materialistic lifestyle where emotional and relational bonding has less space. For example, most of the youngsters spend their time in computers and internet and they are living in a technologically created world away from the real one, this indeed creates a detachment from parents and other relatives. A child who is bought up in such an atmosphere will consider their old aged parents who are not self-capable as a burden.
Secondly, old age homes have sprouted like mushrooms around the globe. The new generation which considers parents as a burden are the reasons for this new trend. For instance, most of the people are eager to amass richness and in this race, they have less time for others, especially parents so they dumb them in old age homes. In the future, these shelter homes will be accepted as a part of the social norms and after a certain age limit, people may be forced to join these places.
To conclude, the above state of perplexity can avoid by taking proactive steps. For example, signing up for health insurance and other retirement schemes will be beneficial for the old aged people, through which, they can avoid over-dependence on their offspring. Besides, spending time with children and creating a bond between parents and youngsters from a very young age will prove beneficial in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | ghikar | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Ammu helen | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | jencydalphy | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | jencydalphy | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | jencydalphy | 73 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Plastic shopping bag contributes to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think that they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Plastic shopping bag contributes to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think that they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- test
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to join these places. To conclude, the above state of perplexity can avoid ...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will prove beneficial in the long run.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98107255521 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75639387819 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558359621451 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3728223281 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141428043057 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492018562821 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367210570691 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879995383729 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257511922359 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.