Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days it is true that using mobile phones and computers is becoming increasingly popular. Many believe that this is the primary culprit of the disappearance of direct communication. While I accept that this may has negative effects to interaction ability, I believe that it is not true for all people.
On the one hand, there are some disadvantages from using mobile phone and computers to human. Firstly, because extremely focusing on their cell phones and computers, people do not pay attention to build a strong relationship. As a result, it would be difficult for them to directly contact with other people in the real life. For example, one of my friend spend almost his time on playing game on his mobile phone. This is reason why he does not know much more about other members and rarely talk to other classmates. In addition, some people tend to use cell phones and computers as a way to forget their lives and satisfy their own needs in the unreal world. Time to time, they become more and more depend on virtual life and then lose their ability to communicate naturally in real life.
On the other hand, people can gain some valuable skills from using these devices to improve face to face communication skills. Mobile phones and computers connecting to the internet enable users to see what way they can effectively talk to each other in the real life. A good example for this is Daily English conversation- a you tube channel teaching people about using English in their life. Furthermore, there are some applications on mobile phones and computers can help people to contact with others in long distance via internet without any difference with face to face communication. For example, people can use Skype or Viber to call to their friends in other countries for multi-purpose including business and studying
In conclusion, using computers and mobile phones may lead to the loss of communication ability. However, the high-tech equipment also can improve interaction skills in many aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | Hai Anh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Uppal singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Anna Trieu | 84 | view |
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profitmakingcompanies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 31
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers Thus people are losing the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'you'?
Suggestion: a; you
...for this is Daily English conversation- a you tube channel teaching people about usin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96449704142 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71899768778 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51775147929 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2523387042 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300537905669 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924023219741 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634562486682 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155672689996 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854157147915 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.