Today more and more tourists are visiting places that are difficult, such as Sahara and Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Nowadays, people more and more choose isolated locations for their holiday destinations. In my opinion, the main advantage of visiting places like Antarctica or Sahara is an opportunity to spend time away from work in an exciting and original way. However, there are also dangers in travelling there, as extremely exotic locations are usually remote and in an emergency help might not be available
On the one hand, difficult holiday destinations are often isolated. In the case of the accident, which could be more possible in dangerous geographic location, help might not be immediately available. For example, travellers in sub-Saharan Africa should consider a fact that reaching the hospital might take as long as four days. Therefore medical assistance might be delayed, resulting in loss of health or even life by the holidaymaker.
On the other hand, choosing a challenging tourist location might benefit a certain type of person who is stuck in a monotonous or stressful job. Travellers attracted by these types of places often tend to look for extreme experiences and might enjoy an adrenaline rush. For example, accordingly to the research published recently in The Guardian, remote and difficult holidays were the most common choice amongst bankers and lawyers, who also pointed out the boredom of their jobs. Therefore some people might benefit from challenging tourist destinations, as they can give them revival and newly found energy to face their work and thus support their mental health.
In conclusion, visiting remote travel locations can benefit people who struggle with dullness and repetitiveness of their work by providing an injection of excitement in their lives. However, it might also have some downfalls, most commonly associated with difficult access to emergency medical help.
- Some people believe that we should invent a new language for international communication To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 78
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- Why is the number of bikes increasing What can be down 89
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an emergency help might not be available On the one hand, difficult holiday desti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...spital might take as long as four days. Therefore medical assistance might be delayed, re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... pointed out the boredom of their jobs. Therefore some people might benefit from challeng...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39788732394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84275765361 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0231703725 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178133205331 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638091899365 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425299494622 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10496748736 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403959642605 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.