Graph chart, computers
The bar charts illustrate the proportion of the population (in percent) owning a computer and computer ownership by education level in the years 2002-2010.
Overall, there had been a steady growth in the percentage of people owning a computer. The same trend can be observed across all levels of education. Through all of the period presented, the lowest percentage of computers was owned by people with no high school diploma, whereas the highest by holders of postgraduate qualifications.
In the year 2002, just over a half of the population had a computer. This number had been rising gradually and reached around 70% in 2010.
Across all of the educational levels computers ownership had been climbing steadily, with the lowest percentage consistently observed amongst those with no high school education (15% and just over 40% in 2002 and 2010 respectively). Numbers rose accordingly to the degree of education: high school graduate, college (incomplete), bachelor's degree, and postgraduate qualification, with the highest ownership of computers, which grew from almost 3/4 to 90% between years 2002 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | ESTAKUR RAHMAN MUNNA | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | kamalena | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...across all levels of education. Through all of the period presented, the lowest percentage...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d reached around 70% in 2010. Across all of the educational levels computers ownership ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igh school graduate, college incomplete, bachelors degree, and postgraduate quali...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39428571429 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01087010273 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7408530755 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109689046052 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511667534426 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910470596993 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913861720225 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11079853389 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.