These days, private sectors tend to pay for and doing scientific research rather than public sectors. Although it is undeniable that it brings a number of advantages, I believe that it does more harm than good.
On the one hand, there will be a number of advantages if private companies investigate scientific research. It is clear that almost private enterprises can adapt to all necessary elements for researching. Because they are independent in finance, they can supply the state-of-the-art equipment for consulting.
On the other hand, I personally claim that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits when private sectors carry out scientific research. First of all, working for the government is the way to take responsibility to society. Since all results are used for the public, scientific workers can contribute to developing their nation. For instance, when the country is facing with the epidemic, experimentation is needed before spreading widely. If researchers worked in public sectors, they would have a chance to devote to the community.
Secondly, there are a lot of opportunities for scientists in learning when they work as public workers. Because of being a member of governmental companies, civil researchers are able to travel or study abroad. As a result, they have a lot of chances to meet, make friends with other researchers in the world. Thanks to that, they can acknowledge as much valuable experience.
In conclusion, even though there are plenty of great assets when private enterprises investigate scientific exploration, I think that the cons outweigh the pros.
- Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor 43
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 56
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 47
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 68
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09394559909 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0979822094 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283814651966 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886141777313 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831148875323 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155370437077 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595222374562 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09394559909 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0979822094 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283814651966 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886141777313 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831148875323 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155370437077 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595222374562 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.