Today, TV channels provide men’s sport shows more than women’s sports shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
Nowadays, television channels broadcast a more significant number of male sports programmes than female sports programmes. This essay will discuss the reasons for this trend and is giving equal time for both men and women sport shows reasonable.
One of the major reasons is that there is a range of sports that men can play but women cannot. This is basically because the two genders are biologically different. This difference helps men to have certain characteristics that women do not have or have but not comparable, namely pace and strength. In fact, the breast is considered as an organ that can cause problems to female athletes’ running ability. Many have taken surgery to cut or make their breasts smaller in order to run faster without feeling the pain in their chest. Therefore, due to the smaller amount of sports that women can play compared to men, it is easy to understand that more men’s sports are broadcasted than women’s sports.
On the other hand, providing the same amount of showtime for both men’s sports and women’s sports on TV channels is not recommended. This is because there would be lower view time, therefore, lower revenue coming from these shows. Most people prefer watching men’s sports to women’s sports because male athletes usually have a higher profession in their areas compared to women. For instance, a TV channel in Vietnam called FootballTV once tried to broadcast the same amount of showtime for men and women in an Asian Olympic. As a result, this led to a reduced amount of view time on the channel with only one-tenth of which belongs to women’s sport while the view time for men’s sports stayed the same.
In conclusion, the imbalance between the showtime of men and women sports spring from the larger number of sports that men can play and we should not have the same amount of time for both genders in sports TV channel because there would be a lower income for the TV commercial companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88023952096 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52749234951 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479041916168 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2477535288 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57567210823 0.244688304435 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217940334251 0.084324248473 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165573069552 0.0667982634062 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.405164258469 0.151304729494 268% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947574225642 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.