Topic essay: Watching a live performance such as a play, concert, or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that it is less interesting when watching a play, concert, or sporting event on television than watching a live these performance events. While there are a few benefits of watching live events, I believe that watching on television has more advantages.
On the one hand, there are two benefits of watching live. The first is that people can meet face to face their idols. Because their idol are who individuals admire and love, so it will be a wonderful experience for everyone to see, smile, talk to idols. For instance, my sister said that she could not forget the moment she met her idol, Son Tung MTP last year. Making new friends is the second advantage. When coming live events, people can meet a great deal of individuals who aslo have a similar hobby with you. Therefore, it might be easy for everyone to make some new friends there. As a result, people can communicate more with others
However, I believe people should watching a play, concert, or sporting event on television instead of waching live for two reasons. Firstly, the tickets to go inside and have a good seat often cost a lot of money, and people might accept that they can not see panoramic view. Meanwhile, all of nice view will be recorded and filmed on television, so eveybody can enjoy them without any fee. Secondly, people can be unhealthy. As well as having headache or earache because of noise, they can get some diseases. For instance, Covid-19, a dangerous virus now, infects easilier in the crowd.
In conclusion, I believe watching performances on television is safer and more enjoyable than waching live the same events
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- the government should allocate more funding to teaching science rather than other subjects in oder for a country to develop and progress 56
- Task 2 Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 61
- the government should invest funds in teaching other subjects as many as science do u agree or disagree 56
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Task 2 Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyable than waching live the same events
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81850533808 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56013651154 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.28237366 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.625 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263481835411 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921891082228 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136798931787 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23619199824 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15046909685 0.056905535591 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.