Topic: Family changes
In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What types of changes are occurring ?
Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
In our fast-paced and highly integrated world, there are irrefutably shifts in family configuration and member roles in each family. From my perspective, these modifications do wonders for the families’ income and financial burden.
First and foremost, as regards the noticeable transformation in family structure, having evolved for a long decade, the household size has a tendency to be more diverse and complex. More specifically, the extended families with a lot of generations shift into detached nuclear families which principally consists of parents and children. In practice, other types of the family such as single-parent families, childless families, blended families or homosexual families become more prevalent. As a result, smaller family sizes can decrease the pressure from pleasing other families members and the financial burden of the household. In addition, they also promote privacy and personal space for each member and care towards others. When duties and involvement in other member’s business decline, each member can utilise more time to develop themselves and pursue their own dream.
Secondly, when it comes to member roles, with the dominance of feminism, breadwinners can be wives while house chores are completed by the husband or there are some both working-parents. Moreover, women are the ones to manage the financial outcomes and incomes of the household as they spend more reasonable budgets than men. Therefore, the parents share their domestic activities and shoulder the financial burden together as the woman’s role in the household is equal to the man’s. Consequently, the income of the families increases drastically as women nowadays climb high in the career leader instead of being housewives.
In general, looking on the bright side, these modifications have some positive corollaries rendering our life easier and happier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-18 | thanhtu000 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | ndt2709 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | RosieMattea | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as regards, in addition, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62807017544 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98621022762 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0112400768 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174966617574 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066634576822 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610551901676 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10138783213 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599305931111 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.