In this knowledge-oriented society, top priority has been given to higher education due to its significance in individual growth and social progress. Under this circumstance, an absolute consensus can hardly be reached whether both students with high marks or those did not do well in the school are qualified for the entrance to a university. I will make an objective analysis of this argument in my following essay.
Some people harbour the belief that best students by all means should have the qualification to enter the university. This is probably true on the grounds that they tend to make much more efforts than other peers in the schooling, which is likely to result in more academic achievements or a higher QS World University Rankings. Besides, these top players who usually gain a stronger sense of self-motivation to reach a higher goal in the years to come can be also set as role models for other students, called ”Catfish Effect”.
However, others maintain that students who do not achieve satisfactory scores but have decent performance in overall development or specialise in one specific field should never be excluded. It is the fact that despite a growing number of university graduates, the gap between the backbone talents required by contemporary society and the vast graduates produced by university is still growing. They ascribe such gap to the discrimination of modern universities where straight-A students are to be solely focused. Instead, they suggest universities should recruit comprehensive talents rather than bookworms alone as the former, with valuable qualities such as teamwork spirit, interpersonal skills, organizing ability and speciality in one field, are more likely to make contribution to society.
From my own perspective, I side with the stance of the latter to a larger extent, believing that more all-round standards other than decent performance in academic study should be adopted by university as enrolment criteria, while academic reputation should by no means be the key target for any higher education insititution.
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.What is your opinion? 89
- 'Prevention is better than cure'.Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Human activity has had negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both the views and give your opinion? 89
- Topic Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks others say that they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your own opinions 96
- Some people think that famous people’s support towards international aids organisations draws attention to problems, while other think that celebrities make the problems less important.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38719512195 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13228181941 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618902439024 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8996920032 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.636363636 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8181818182 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202971002895 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719121357167 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501283045644 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113455498141 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024689544617 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.