Topic:the government should invest more money in science rather than other subjects to develop the country.
It is said that government funding for education should give preference to science-based subjects over others, in a bid to noticably boost the national development and progress. Although, a growing number of benefits from scientific perspective have dramatically assist the mankind in terms of many fields, this essay disagrees that science is a core element.
There is no doubt that the crucial role of science totally has a huge influence on societies function. For example, in light of proliferation of modern science, labor-intensive tasks can be done by automation with ease and precision, especially in manufacturing sector. The sosphiticated background of science is the force driving behind a wide range of human’s success. More vitally, creating many benificial advantanges pushing people’s satisfactory standard of living. Moreover, there is a strong relation between science and life that can aid the national leaders raising the citizen’s awareness to combat an increasing number of global issuses.
On the other hand, the remarkable development of science must not the main measure of a country’s growth. It is fairly easy to realize that the study of other knowledge is extremely vital in the developed world. Take for example, the Arts and Humanities. Subjects such as History and Geography have allowed or encouraged people to take notices and enjoy a core set of values that planet Earth has brought to the globe. Other subjects such as the Arts, push the society to be more connect and develop with the vast creation. Besides, it can be argued that this can also support to improve the quality of people’s lives and partly contribute to the predictor of success.
In conclusion, although developments in science have led to many fundamental benefits for most nations, science alone is not the key contributor to a country’s growth. In my opinion, the mixture and connection of a wide range of sectors will bring the best result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Palak gupta | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | cuongthkl0202 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | tnt6596 | 84 | view |
- Topic: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Topic:the government should invest more money in science rather than other subjects to develop the country. 78
- Topic: Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? Provide relevant example if necessary. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'assisted'.
Suggestion: assisted
...cientific perspective have dramatically assist the mankind in terms of many fields, th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. In conclusion, although developments in science have led to many fundamental ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31210191083 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12285790106 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6097963003 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187126971689 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608474449033 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606344999422 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111390734977 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420308458934 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.