The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
Nowadays, eating habits with family are gradually fading. This essay will outline a number of reasons and a number of its associated effects.
Firstly, the younger people today are facing a lot of pressure more than ever before. As a student, one has to deal with heavy educational programs, and typically children in Asian nations usually spend about 10 hours a day and 6 days a week at school, not to mention extra classes in the evening. So they end up having no time to spend with their family members but rather friends. As a worker, one is too occupied with his/her work and social relationships. For example, in Japan, after finish administrative working hours people tend to still at work until late evening and then they would attend exchanges with their colleagues before going home. Secondly, the fast-food culture of modern life is replacing traditional meals because fast food can be found everywhere and is usually an inexpensive food choice. Young people in VietNam, for instance, often grab a quick meal after a busy day at work or school, which leads them skipping meals with their family.
The trend has both positive and negative impacts on people. In terms of the benefits, they are able to be much more flexible with their time since they will not have to show up at a fixed hour to have meals with their family and can eat whatever and whenever they want. However, in terms of negative effects, eating together is not only the key to maintaining family values, but also a time to help people engage. The lacking of interaction between family members through meals would widen the gap between generations and the consequence is leading to conflict and unhappiness.
In conclusion, the tendency of family members eating separately is mainly caused by the difference in their schedules or the preference to eat fast food, which can have both beneficial and detrimental impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- As life expectancy is increasing people work after retirement with pay Alternatively some people start to work at a young age Are these positive or negative impacts 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 84
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91925465839 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58490333322 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4831562395 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145906298783 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520216888132 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400727176634 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100232242803 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345917194744 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.