The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What is the reason? What are the impacts?
Although the recently ever-developing society has had a number of positive impacts, there has been a lot of negative effects on the human community, especially the disappear of meals in families. The situation has been derived from several different reasons and had a wide variety of effects on many aspects of human life.
There are various sources causing the meals of a family to disappear. In fact, today people have faced with a huge amount of responsibilities from the workplace and other areas of society. It means that members of a family have to divide their time to many distinct tasks, thus having not enough time for their family as well as family meals. Another reason is that the relationship of family, in today’s society, has been gradually eroding. Therefore, they have had a trend to spend their time on other activities like going shopping and hanging out with friends instead of enjoying meals with their relatives.
The condition that all members of a family do not eat meals together can bring many negative impacts. Firstly, the deterioration of meals among relatives can adversely affect the connection between families. For example, if members of the family do not take part in meals together, they will have not opportunities to more profoundly understand each other. As a result, the link between them will decrease dramatically. In addition, children’s health decline is also a result of the situation. The reason for this is that when parents and children do not have meals together mothers and fathers will be not able to take care of their kid’s diets. As a consequence, unhealthy diets could lead to negative impacts on the health of the young generation even serious aftereffects latter on.
In conclusion, the pressure from society and the erosion of family relationship are main reasons resulting in the disappear of family meals. And the condition could have severe impacts on family harmony and children’s health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-11 | nguyen thi thu hien | 73 | view |
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people say that subjects like arts music drama and creative writing are more beneficial to children and therefore they need more of these subjects to be included in the timetable Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 86
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ects on the human community, especially the disappear of meals in families. The situation has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...es. The situation has been derived from several different reasons and had a wide variety of effec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ationship are main reasons resulting in the disappear of family meals. And the condition coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily harmony and children's health.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13664596273 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89354344186 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7168217579 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182625538965 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635009103984 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511214810964 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112365028591 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452584114905 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.