Traditional methods of food preparation are becoming less popular. Why do think this is?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own experience.
Gone are the days when people used to prepare foods with traditional styles. Presently, the importance of customary ways to make foods is declining day by day due to changes in lifestyle and eating habits of people. Here, I would like to throw light on possible causes behind this phenomenon.
There are multifarious causes behind it. First and foremost, the existence of fast food cultural is responsible to decrease significant of cultural food. For example, widespread restaurants allure people to taste fast foods and prepare them at their homes. Thus, growing popularity of junk foods adverts people to use traditional ways to cook foods. Furthermore, the desires of saving time in this rat race of achieving more and more also discourage people towards traditional time consuming methods.
Furthermore, the role of generations gap to send customary ways of edible things at the back seat is phenomenonal. For instance, modern generation does not spend time with elders because of difference in thinking to learn traditional cooking. Thus, cultural ways of food preparation are at the low ebb. What is more, the availability of cooking programs on television, internet sites relevant to recipes and cooking techniques and magazines stimulate people to prepare diverse continental foods. Hence, worldwide prevalence of different cultural foods is vanishing existence of heritage food items.
In addition, in my school days, mostly students used to eat home made foods because of adequate time for parents to make food at home and absence of junk food in canteen. By contrast, nowadays, the presence of fast foods in canteens of schools allure children towards spicy foods. So, the interest of every age group is diminishing towards making traditional foods. All of above, the emergence of microwave ovens, stoves, heaters and gas burgers are leading people to innovative methods of cooking foods.
The recapitulate, the air of advancement has invited creative expressions of food preparation and therefore orthodox ways are no longer of that importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-26 | Manidersingh | 78 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish why do you think this is happening? What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish production? 56
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook,have had a huge negative impact on both individual and Society.To what extent do you agree 56
- Traditional methods of food preparation are becoming less popular. Why do think this is?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own experience. 78
- Some people want their country to host international sports events . While others , believe it brings more problems than benefits.Discuss and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days when people used to prepare fo...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... traditional time consuming methods. Furthermore, the role of generations gap to send cu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...innovative methods of cooking foods. The recapitulate, the air of advancement has invited cre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88067974713 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4373789268 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157619388385 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517263315092 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301559899637 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897384527155 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228391841207 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.