In the twentieth century, contact between different parts of the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunications.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Modern technological advances in communication systems and the convenience of air travel have made connections possible between various countries worldwide. While there are advantages and disadvantages to this topic, I believe the positive aspects take precedence over the drawbacks.
The developments of the aviation industry have facilitated international trade and tourism. Firstly, improvements in the transportation sector have given rise to economic collaborations between countries. As a result, countries have worldwide access to trade and commerce with affordable commodities. Moreover, tourism is one of the industries that rely heavily on aviation. By facilitating tourism in many countries of the world including Greece, Italy and Thailand, air transport helps generate economic growth. In addition, advancements in telecommunication technologies have greatly impacted the way people and nations interact with each other at a worldwide level. For instance, companies are able to exchange business documents electronically with customers and suppliers in remote locations instantaneously. By improving the telecom system, countless businesses have witnessed an increase in their productivity and increased growth.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages when it comes to modern technology. The increased utilization of airplanes has contributed to global warming, resulting in a significant carbon footprint. Furthermore, worldwide communication has led to social and cultural implications. Consequently, there will be a loss of cultural barriers and cultural identity due to the amalgamation of cultures globally.
I would therefore argue that although there are a few disadvantages regarding worldwide connections, there are a plethora of advantages that outweigh the negative aspects. It facilitates economic growth, tourism and the instant exchange of data.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam how true do you think this statement is what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 56
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why is this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
- Many governments have laws that ban the sale and use of hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine yet they allow people to buy drugs such as tobacco and alcohol Laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs should be applied to all drugs including tobacco 89
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why is this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
- Water pollution has become an increasing problem over the past few decades What causes water pollution How can we prevent this problem 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17490494297 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50692389863 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634980988593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3334978819 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113938127178 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321282831789 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375264820493 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728556550425 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417786493983 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 11.3001002004 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.21 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17490494297 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50692389863 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634980988593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3334978819 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113938127178 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321282831789 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375264820493 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728556550425 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417786493983 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 11.3001002004 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.21 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.