The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue that corporal punishment should be necessary or not in educational institutes to improve the behaviour of students. It has been a moot point for years. A lion's share of society favors it, however, the rest reverse it. I am of the opinion that corporal punishment is unwarranted because it affects students mentally and physically.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. Physical punishment like spanking has not any positive effect on students, even it worsens the situation. For instance, when students create ruckus in class then physical punishment like hitting makes them more aggressive.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that discipline is important for every student or children but not enforcing it by corporal punishment. This type of punishment creates fear in students' minds and even they will try to skip school and hide their mistakes students will not give respect to teachers.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the drawbacks of corporal punishment are indeed to dire to ignore. Instead of punishment, teachers need to set role models for students with their actions and behaviour. They need to guide them with other activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-07 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | longpham2k | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | tony19104 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | eeshwar | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | jazzlen | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 11
- Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older while others think they should stay at home with the family Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15942028986 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77573123518 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632850241546 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.78490259 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229686967321 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715515461889 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052896896839 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12937587681 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195138075804 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.