The uses of mobile phone have a lot of negative impacts on social, medical and technical problems.
What are the problems of using mobile phone?
Do you think that using mobile phone is negative?
Some people argue that using cellular phones has led to many social, medical, and technical issues. While it has been proven its drawbacks, I hold an opinion that the benefits of mobile phone use outweigh their negative sides.
On the one hand, there is no denying a variety of harmful impacts of cellular phones on social life and the users’ health and technical problems. In terms of health issues, phone users tend to get eye diseases such as shortsightedness more than ordinary people who hardly use them. People surrounding them are likely affected by the phone’s noises and notifications forgotten to turn off. As a result, the users are capable of being undervalued because of their impolite manners, or even facing extremely damaging situations on the roads, for example, pickpockets or robbers. According to the American survey about traffic accidents, the rate of collisions caused by using phones is remarkably high, which poses puzzle challenges for local authorities to tackle those problems.
However, I believe that people could gain more potential benefits from cellular phones than their detrimental influence if they have reasonable purposes and time-use. Thanks to mobile phones, thousands of people worldwide can run their own business directly and conveniently whenever and wherever they want, without bulky laptops or computers. Despite the widespread Coronavirus pandemic, people could continue to browse the Internet and communicate with their relatives by their small phones. Teachers could also use mobile phones to connect regularly with students and their families in order to follow the student’s pace in learning.
In conclusion, cellular phones play a crucial role in daily life in the modern period. Although there are many strong arguments about the negative impacts of cell phone use, I am firmly convinced that their great functions take up more significant parts than the opposite sides unless people overuse them and become addicted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think family has the most powerful influence on children s development Others however believe that other things have greater effects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40776699029 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68605294948 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644012944984 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0175312497 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3205531278 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11769024 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767438075025 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214242557883 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794608009777 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.